Scott J. Pawlak
Scott’s practice focuses on first- and third-party automobile defense, premises liability actions and construction liability matters. Scott has handled cases at the State and Federal level. He has also served as a mediator in Wayne and Macomb Counties.
Member, Oakland County Bar Association
Member, Michigan Defense Trial Counsel (MTDC)
Committee Co-Chair, MDTC Social Media Committee
Chair, Social Committee, Student Bar Association (2013-2014)
Won summary disposition in Wayne County Circuit Court for defendant insurer in first-party No Fault case. Successfully moved for dismissal of Plaintiff’s entire claim, pursuant to the fraud exclusion of the insurance contract, based on Plaintiff’s fraudulent representations regarding his wage loss claim. More than $650,000 in first-party benefits were extinguished as a result of the decision. (2017)
Won summary disposition in Wayne County Circuit Court for insurer in first-party No Fault case. The Court agreed with defendant insurer that a Plaintiff daughter’s claim under her mother’s automobile insurance policy that had been previously rescinded was barred by the collateral estoppel and collateral attack doctrines. The Court further found that there was no factual development that could result in PIP coverage under the policy, and Plaintiff’s claims were therefore dismissed with prejudice. (2017)
Won Summary Disposition in Wayne County Circuit Court, successfully obtaining rescission of a No-Fault Automobile Policy. The Court agreed with the defendant that the insured’s fraudulent representations in the application process were material, and the insurer was therefore entitled to rescind its policy. (2016)
Won summary disposition in Oakland County Circuit Court for defendants sued in automobile accident. Plaintiff alleged negligence against their clients, defendant driver and owner of the other vehicle involved in the accident, the Court granted summary disposition to defendants and found that as a matter of law, defendants could not be found negligent as alleged by the plaintiff in this case. The plaintiff had been a passenger in a vehicle driven by his wife. Despite plaintiff’s arguments to the contrary, the facts simply did not support any theory that Defendants were negligent in any way. As a result, the Court dismissed the case against them with prejudice. (2016)
Won summary disposition in Oakland County Circuit Court for national pet store chain sued in dog-bite case. The Court, agreeing with the defendant, found that Plaintiff’s claims failed because: 1) there was no precedent under either ordinary negligence or premises liability principles to impose a leash length requirement to protect customers from dogs owned by third parties, 2) there was no evidence that the pet store had prior knowledge of the dog’s vicious behavior, and 3) there was no evidence that the dog bite was created by the defendant’s active negligence. The Court also dismissed Plaintiff’s claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress and loss of consortium. (2015)
Scott has presented to claims adjustment groups on issues facing insurers in district courts, and the importance of maintaining communication between claims representatives and the attorney.